<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Footpenis&#8217; would have been a funnier name&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sodblog.com/media/movies/hancock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sodblog.com/media/movies/hancock/</link>
	<description>The Internet&#039;s home for sarcasm.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leighdu</title>
		<link>http://sodblog.com/media/movies/hancock/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>leighdu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sodblog.com/?p=617#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I 2nd waiting for the dvd on this one, which, since I am a bit late at replying, should be soon. Sure, there were good laughs here and there, but the plot twists to so many different things that it makes the movie sup par at best.  As usual though, Smith did a great job with what little he had to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I 2nd waiting for the dvd on this one, which, since I am a bit late at replying, should be soon. Sure, there were good laughs here and there, but the plot twists to so many different things that it makes the movie sup par at best.  As usual though, Smith did a great job with what little he had to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanju123</title>
		<link>http://sodblog.com/media/movies/hancock/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>sanju123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sodblog.com/?p=617#comment-565</guid>
		<description>The reviews of the movie kept me away from the theater, but my sons were thrilled to see the movie. The idea of a guy having superpowers and not using them the usual way, was amusing to them. Everytime when Will Smith attempts to do good but proves to be a flop made them jump out of their seats. But I think it was meant for this kind of audiences only, little nutty ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviews of the movie kept me away from the theater, but my sons were thrilled to see the movie. The idea of a guy having superpowers and not using them the usual way, was amusing to them. Everytime when Will Smith attempts to do good but proves to be a flop made them jump out of their seats. But I think it was meant for this kind of audiences only, little nutty ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Day</title>
		<link>http://sodblog.com/media/movies/hancock/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sodblog.com/?p=617#comment-564</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail on the head with this one. While I think I got a little more enjoyment out of it then you did, you were totally right about the subplots, which I blame on the pacing.

Oh and LOL @ &#039;Footpenis&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail on the head with this one. While I think I got a little more enjoyment out of it then you did, you were totally right about the subplots, which I blame on the pacing.</p>
<p>Oh and LOL @ &#8216;Footpenis&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

